Preview: Next Week

Next week we will discuss the effects of the infamous Disconnection policy that the Church of Scientology uses. The disconnection policy as stated in the Hubbard Communication Office Bulliten:

A Scientologist can become PTS by reason of being connected to someone that is
antagonistic to Scientology or its tenets. In order to resolve the PTS
condition, he either HANDLES the other person's antagonism (as covered in the
materials on PTS handling) or, as a last resort when all attempts to handle have
failed, he disconnects from the person. He is simply exercising his right to
communicate or not to communicate with a particular person.-L. Ron Hubbard, 9/10/83

In essence, it seperates anyone who the CoS feels is an antagonist to
Scientology from said person or family. For example: Say Jane Doe is a Scientologist, but John Doe isn't too cool with Scientology and even urged her to leave. If John didn't stop, he would be 'disconnected', or seperated from Jane. We'll get more in-depth about this next week, but for now, go to these websites for more information:

http://www.scientologydisconnection.com/

http://members.chello.nl/mgormez/childabuse/disconnect.html

http://www.scientomogy.com/disconnection/

This is Autononymous, signing off.

Tell Your Story!

My blog is in need of testimony from people who have first-hand experience with the 'church', so feel free to give your testimony in the comments box. If you wish, you can be kept anonymous as well. I have plenty of testimony from people such as Tory Christman, but if you want your story to be heard, go for it!

Thanks,

Autononymous

Why Scientology?

Hello all, thank you for visiting my new blog. This blog is intended to reveal the truth behind the 'Church' of Scientology. For example, what kind of church copyrights its religious symbols? Look at the logo of the CoS and there will be a little copyright symbol beneath it. Now, I understand these are different times, but I don't know why you would copyright religious symbols, even in this day and age. The CoS also has a notorious record of trying to silence their critics, something comparable to the Catholic Church in the middle ages. They call this policy "Fair Game" and it says that critics "May be deprived of property or injured by any means by any Scientologist without any discipline of the Scientologist. May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed." However, a year later, Hubbard sent a letter to his orgs (or offices) saying "The practice of declaring people FAIR GAME will cease. FAIR GAME may not appear on any Ethics Order. It causes bad public relations."

It just said that the Fair Game policy was to cease, because it give them a bad rap. However, there is proof today that the Fair Game policy is still in effect. For example, Gareth Alan Coles, a protester of Scientology belonging to the group Anonymous, was subject to the FG policy during a protest on March 15. As shown from this video,

http://youtube.com/watch?v=exwIGGaztx4

Gareth was followed around by Scientologists posing as Anonymous members holding up a sign with his information on it. This just shows how far the Church of Scientology is willing to go to intimidate its critics. What other Church tries to silence those who disagree with them? Fair Game policy is still in effect, folks. In fact, it is quite likely that Scientologists will try to get this blog taken down for 'religious harassment' or some rubbish like that. Just ask Doyle6315, who recently had his account on YouTube taken down after many 'concerned YouTube members' flagged his videos for religious intolerance. In fact, what most flags were referencing was a video where Doyle compared the CoS to Nazis. Now, this is worthy of a warning, maybe even a takedown notice, but not a complete suspension of the account. The thing about YouTube is that the CoS has many advertisements on the site. Whenever the 'Church' wants anything taken down, they get preference because of the money they give YT via advertisements. YouTube cares more about profits than 1st amendment rights to free speech, and, apparently, so does the CoS.

Again, I am not trying to attack Scientology, nor any religion. If people want to practice Scientology, the freezone has ex-members of the 'Church' who can get all teaching materials of Scientology for free. The 'Church' makes people pay ridiculous 'donations' just to learn about dianetics and the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard. In fact, it is takes an estimated $3oo,ooo to get to the top of Scientology, which is why many people join the freezone.

I am not promoting religous intolerance, nor am I part of a terrorist group. I am urging people to come to their own conclusions about this. If my argument does not agree with your conscience, you don't have to read my blog or any other blog that protests the wrongs done by the Church of Scientology. And there is nothing the 'Church' can do about it because they do not know my name, address, or anything else that they may use for their creepy purposes. I am anonymous, like so many others who have took a stand to protest something that does not agree with their morals, conscience, or ethics. That something happens to be the Church of Scientology.

God Bless,

Autononymous